1960 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 1996 Toyota Carina
To start off, 1996 Toyota Carina is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac Eldorado (210 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 1996 Toyota Carina. (82 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 1996 Toyota Carina.
Because 1960 Cadillac Eldorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Cadillac Eldorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Toyota Carina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Cadillac Eldorado | 1996 Toyota Carina | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | Eldorado | Carina |
Year Released | 1960 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6389 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 82 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1420 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 60 L |