1960 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 2000 Chevrolet Astro
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 1003 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Astro.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Cadillac Eldorado. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1960 Cadillac Eldorado (590 Nm) has 251 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet Astro. (339 Nm). This means 1960 Cadillac Eldorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet Astro.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Cadillac Eldorado | 2000 Chevrolet Astro | |
| Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
| Model | Eldorado | Astro |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6389 cc | 4300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 590 Nm | 339 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2190 kg | 1187 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1940 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2790 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 64 L |
