1960 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 2003 Dodge Neon
To start off, 2003 Dodge Neon is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 333 kg more than 2003 Dodge Neon.
Because 1960 Cadillac Eldorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Cadillac Eldorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Cadillac Eldorado | 2003 Dodge Neon | |
Make | Cadillac | Dodge |
Model | Eldorado | Neon |
Year Released | 1960 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6389 cc | 2399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 101.3 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2190 kg | 1857 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2670 mm |