1960 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 2009 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2009 Holden Cruze is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac Eldorado (210 HP) has 100 more horse power than 2009 Holden Cruze. (110 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 2009 Holden Cruze.
Because 1960 Cadillac Eldorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Cadillac Eldorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1960 Cadillac Eldorado (590 Nm) has 437 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Holden Cruze. (153 Nm). This means 1960 Cadillac Eldorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Cadillac Eldorado | 2009 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | Eldorado | Cruze |
Year Released | 1960 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6389 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 110 HP |
Torque | 590 Nm | 153 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2685 mm |