1960 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 2013 Aston Martin Vantage
To start off, 2013 Aston Martin Vantage is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 560 kg more than 2013 Aston Martin Vantage.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1960 Cadillac Eldorado (590 Nm) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Aston Martin Vantage. (469 Nm). This means 1960 Cadillac Eldorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Aston Martin Vantage.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Cadillac Eldorado | 2013 Aston Martin Vantage | |
Make | Cadillac | Aston Martin |
Model | Eldorado | Vantage |
Year Released | 1960 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6389 cc | 5935 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 7300 RPM |
Torque | 590 Nm | 469 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 91 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2190 kg | 1630 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4382 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 80 L |