1960 Cadillac Seville vs. 1983 Donkervoort S7
To start off, 1983 Donkervoort S7 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac Seville. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac Seville would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac Seville is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac Seville (211 HP) has 101 more horse power than 1983 Donkervoort S7. (110 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac Seville should accelerate faster than 1983 Donkervoort S7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1960 Cadillac Seville (590 Nm) has 427 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Donkervoort S7. (163 Nm). This means 1960 Cadillac Seville will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Donkervoort S7.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Cadillac Seville | 1983 Donkervoort S7 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Donkervoort |
| Model | Seville | S7 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 211 HP | 110 HP |
| Torque | 590 Nm | 163 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 3570 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1080 mm |
