1960 Cadillac Seville vs. 1997 Mercedes-Benz Swatch
To start off, 1997 Mercedes-Benz Swatch is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac Seville. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac Seville would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac Seville weights approximately 150 kg more than 1997 Mercedes-Benz Swatch.
Because 1960 Cadillac Seville is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Cadillac Seville. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Mercedes-Benz Swatch, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Cadillac Seville | 1997 Mercedes-Benz Swatch | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Seville | Swatch |
Year Released | 1960 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 211 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 2050 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2860 mm |