1960 Cadillac Seville vs. 1999 Renault Clio
To start off, 1999 Renault Clio is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac Seville. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac Seville would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac Seville weights approximately 1265 kg more than 1999 Renault Clio.
Because 1960 Cadillac Seville is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Cadillac Seville. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Cadillac Seville | 1999 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Cadillac | Renault |
| Model | Seville | Clio |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1999 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 211 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 935 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2770 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 50 L |
