1960 Chevrolet Bel Air vs. 2000 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2000 Toyota Tundra is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Chevrolet Bel Air. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Chevrolet Bel Air would be higher. At 3,869 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Chevrolet Bel Air is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 344 kg more than 1960 Chevrolet Bel Air.
Because 2000 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Chevrolet Bel Air. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Chevrolet Bel Air | 2000 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
| Model | Bel Air | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3869 cc | 3400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 187 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1376 kg | 1720 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 3270 mm |
