1960 Chevrolet Bel Air vs. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Chevrolet Bel Air. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Chevrolet Bel Air would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1064 kg more than 1960 Chevrolet Bel Air.
Because 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Chevrolet Bel Air. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Chevrolet Bel Air | 2005 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Land Rover |
| Model | Bel Air | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3869 cc | 4392 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 282 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1376 kg | 2440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2890 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 100 L |
