1960 Chevrolet Bel Air vs. 2008 Daewoo Rezzo
To start off, 2008 Daewoo Rezzo is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Chevrolet Bel Air. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Chevrolet Bel Air would be higher. At 3,869 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Chevrolet Bel Air is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Chevrolet Bel Air weights approximately 29 kg more than 2008 Daewoo Rezzo.
Because 1960 Chevrolet Bel Air is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Chevrolet Bel Air. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Daewoo Rezzo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Chevrolet Bel Air | 2008 Daewoo Rezzo | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Daewoo |
| Model | Bel Air | Rezzo |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3869 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 103 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1376 kg | 1347 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 60 L |
