1960 Chevrolet Corvair vs. 1963 MG 1100
To start off, 1963 MG 1100 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Chevrolet Corvair. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Chevrolet Corvair would be higher. At 2,368 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Chevrolet Corvair is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Chevrolet Corvair (81 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1963 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Chevrolet Corvair should accelerate faster than 1963 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Chevrolet Corvair weights approximately 345 kg more than 1963 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Chevrolet Corvair is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Chevrolet Corvair. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 MG 1100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Chevrolet Corvair | 1963 MG 1100 | |
Make | Chevrolet | MG |
Model | Corvair | 1100 |
Year Released | 1960 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 2368 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 825 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2380 mm |