1960 Chevrolet Corvair vs. 1998 Mazda 323
To start off, 1998 Mazda 323 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Chevrolet Corvair. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Chevrolet Corvair would be higher. At 2,368 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Chevrolet Corvair is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Chevrolet Corvair (81 HP) has 7 more horse power than 1998 Mazda 323. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Chevrolet Corvair should accelerate faster than 1998 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Chevrolet Corvair weights approximately 115 kg more than 1998 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Chevrolet Corvair is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Chevrolet Corvair. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Mazda 323, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Chevrolet Corvair | 1998 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Corvair | 323 |
Year Released | 1960 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 2368 cc | 1324 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 74 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 55 L |