1960 Chevrolet Corvair vs. 1998 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 1998 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Chevrolet Corvair. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Chevrolet Corvair would be higher. At 5,439 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Mercedes-Benz C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mercedes-Benz C (342 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 261 more horse power than 1960 Chevrolet Corvair. (81 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 1960 Chevrolet Corvair. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mercedes-Benz C weights approximately 400 kg more than 1960 Chevrolet Corvair. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Chevrolet Corvair | 1998 Mercedes-Benz C | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Corvair | C |
Year Released | 1960 | 1998 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 2368 cc | 5439 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 342 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 62 L |