1960 Chevrolet Corvair vs. 2002 Saab 9-X
To start off, 2002 Saab 9-X is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Chevrolet Corvair. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Chevrolet Corvair would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Saab 9-X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Saab 9-X (300 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 219 more horse power than 1960 Chevrolet Corvair. (81 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Saab 9-X should accelerate faster than 1960 Chevrolet Corvair. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Saab 9-X weights approximately 170 kg more than 1960 Chevrolet Corvair. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Saab 9-X is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Chevrolet Corvair. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Saab 9-X will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Chevrolet Corvair | 2002 Saab 9-X | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Saab |
| Model | Corvair | 9-X |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 2287 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 300 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1330 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2710 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 61 L |
