1960 Chrysler Imperial vs. 1996 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1996 Ford Mustang is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Chrysler Imperial. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Chrysler Imperial would be higher. At 5,802 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Chrysler Imperial is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Mustang (350 HP) has 74 more horse power than 1960 Chrysler Imperial. (276 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1960 Chrysler Imperial. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Chrysler Imperial weights approximately 1015 kg more than 1996 Ford Mustang.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Ford Mustang (556 Nm) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Chrysler Imperial. (510 Nm). This means 1996 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Chrysler Imperial.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Chrysler Imperial | 1996 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | Imperial | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5802 cc | 4601 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 276 HP | 350 HP |
| Torque | 510 Nm | 556 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2360 kg | 1345 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 6170 mm | 4620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3800 mm | 2580 mm |
