1960 Chrysler Imperial vs. 2001 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2001 Ford Falcon is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Chrysler Imperial. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Chrysler Imperial would be higher. At 5,802 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Chrysler Imperial is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Chrysler Imperial (276 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2001 Ford Falcon. (220 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Chrysler Imperial should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Chrysler Imperial weights approximately 845 kg more than 2001 Ford Falcon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1960 Chrysler Imperial (510 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford Falcon. (357 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1960 Chrysler Imperial will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford Falcon.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Chrysler Imperial | 2001 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | Imperial | Falcon |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5802 cc | 3983 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 276 HP | 220 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 510 Nm | 357 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2360 kg | 1515 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 6170 mm | 4910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3800 mm | 2800 mm |
