1960 Chrysler Imperial vs. 2002 Ford Tonka
To start off, 2002 Ford Tonka is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Chrysler Imperial. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Chrysler Imperial would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford Tonka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Chrysler Imperial (276 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 2002 Ford Tonka. (128 HP @ 6150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Chrysler Imperial should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Tonka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Chrysler Imperial weights approximately 1058 kg more than 2002 Ford Tonka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Tonka (814 Nm) has 304 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Chrysler Imperial. (510 Nm). This means 2002 Ford Tonka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Chrysler Imperial.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Chrysler Imperial | 2002 Ford Tonka | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | Imperial | Tonka |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5802 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 276 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6150 RPM |
| Torque | 510 Nm | 814 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2360 kg | 1302 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 6170 mm | 6150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2370 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 2140 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3800 mm | 4200 mm |
