1960 Chrysler Imperial vs. 2004 Lancia Zeta
To start off, 2004 Lancia Zeta is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Chrysler Imperial. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Chrysler Imperial would be higher. At 5,802 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Chrysler Imperial is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Chrysler Imperial (276 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 2004 Lancia Zeta. (129 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Chrysler Imperial should accelerate faster than 2004 Lancia Zeta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Chrysler Imperial weights approximately 760 kg more than 2004 Lancia Zeta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1960 Chrysler Imperial (510 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 330 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Lancia Zeta. (180 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 1960 Chrysler Imperial will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Lancia Zeta.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Chrysler Imperial | 2004 Lancia Zeta | |
Make | Chrysler | Lancia |
Model | Imperial | Zeta |
Year Released | 1960 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5802 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 276 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 510 Nm | 180 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2360 kg | 1600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6170 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3800 mm | 2830 mm |