1960 Chrysler Imperial vs. 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Chrysler Imperial. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Chrysler Imperial would be higher. At 5,802 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Chrysler Imperial is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK (362 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1960 Chrysler Imperial. (276 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1960 Chrysler Imperial. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Chrysler Imperial weights approximately 711 kg more than 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK.
Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 510 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Chrysler Imperial | 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Imperial | CLK |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5802 cc | 5441 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 276 HP | 362 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 510 Nm | 510 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2360 kg | 1649 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 6170 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3800 mm | 2700 mm |
