1960 Chrysler Imperial vs. 2005 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2005 Ford Mustang is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Chrysler Imperial. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Chrysler Imperial would be higher. At 5,802 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Chrysler Imperial is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Mustang (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1960 Chrysler Imperial. (276 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1960 Chrysler Imperial. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Chrysler Imperial weights approximately 795 kg more than 2005 Ford Mustang.
Let's talk about torque, 1960 Chrysler Imperial (510 Nm) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Mustang. (434 Nm). This means 1960 Chrysler Imperial will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Chrysler Imperial | 2005 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | Imperial | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5802 cc | 4603 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 276 HP | 300 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 510 Nm | 434 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2360 kg | 1565 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 6170 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3800 mm | 2620 mm |
