1960 Chrysler Imperial vs. 2008 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2008 Ford Ranger is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Chrysler Imperial. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Chrysler Imperial would be higher. At 5,802 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Chrysler Imperial is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Chrysler Imperial (276 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 2008 Ford Ranger. (148 HP @ 4900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Chrysler Imperial should accelerate faster than 2008 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Chrysler Imperial weights approximately 1253 kg more than 2008 Ford Ranger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1960 Chrysler Imperial (510 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 265 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Ford Ranger. (245 Nm @ 3950 RPM). This means 1960 Chrysler Imperial will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Chrysler Imperial | 2008 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Imperial | Ranger |
Year Released | 1960 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5802 cc | 2970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 276 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 510 Nm | 245 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3950 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2360 kg | 1107 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6170 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3800 mm | 3200 mm |