1960 Chrysler Imperial vs. 2009 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2009 Jeep Commander is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Chrysler Imperial. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Chrysler Imperial would be higher. At 5,802 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Chrysler Imperial is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Commander (358 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1960 Chrysler Imperial. (276 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 1960 Chrysler Imperial. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Chrysler Imperial weights approximately 317 kg more than 2009 Jeep Commander.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Commander (527 Nm @ 4350 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Chrysler Imperial. (510 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2009 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Chrysler Imperial.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Chrysler Imperial | 2009 Jeep Commander | |
Make | Chrysler | Jeep |
Model | Imperial | Commander |
Year Released | 1960 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5802 cc | 5654 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 276 HP | 358 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 510 Nm | 527 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4350 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2360 kg | 2043 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6170 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3800 mm | 2790 mm |