1960 Chrysler New Yorker vs. 2010 Hyundai Matrix
To start off, 2010 Hyundai Matrix is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Chrysler New Yorker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Chrysler New Yorker would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Chrysler New Yorker weights approximately 567 kg more than 2010 Hyundai Matrix.
Because 1960 Chrysler New Yorker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Chrysler New Yorker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Hyundai Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Chrysler New Yorker | 2010 Hyundai Matrix | |
| Make | Chrysler | Hyundai |
| Model | New Yorker | Matrix |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 102 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1890 kg | 1323 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2610 mm |
