1960 Chrysler New Yorker vs. 2010 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2010 Volvo XC60 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Chrysler New Yorker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Chrysler New Yorker would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 3 kg more than 1960 Chrysler New Yorker.
Because 2010 Volvo XC60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Chrysler New Yorker. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo XC60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Chrysler New Yorker | 2010 Volvo XC60 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
| Model | New Yorker | XC60 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 281 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1890 kg | 1893 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 4628 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1712 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2774 mm |
