1960 Citroen 2CV vs. 1953 Ford 12 M
To start off, 1960 Citroen 2CV is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,171 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Ford 12 M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Ford 12 M (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1960 Citroen 2CV. (11 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1953 Ford 12 M should accelerate faster than 1960 Citroen 2CV.
Because 1953 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Citroen 2CV | 1953 Ford 12 M | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | 2CV | 12 M |
Year Released | 1960 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 375 cc | 1171 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 11 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2500 mm |