1960 Citroen 2CV vs. 2002 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2002 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 179 more horse power than 1960 Citroen 2CV. (11 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1960 Citroen 2CV.
Because 2002 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Citroen 2CV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 297 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Citroen 2CV. (22 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Citroen 2CV.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Citroen 2CV | 2002 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Citroen | Jeep |
| Model | 2CV | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 375 cc | 3960 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 11 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 22 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 3860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2380 mm |
