1960 Citroen 2CV vs. 2003 Renault Megane
To start off, 2003 Renault Megane is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 1,900 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Megane (118 HP) has 107 more horse power than 1960 Citroen 2CV. (11 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1960 Citroen 2CV.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Renault Megane (280 Nm) has 258 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Citroen 2CV. (22 Nm). This means 2003 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Citroen 2CV.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Citroen 2CV | 2003 Renault Megane | |
Make | Citroen | Renault |
Model | 2CV | Megane |
Year Released | 1960 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 375 cc | 1900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 11 HP | 118 HP |
Torque | 22 Nm | 280 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2680 mm |