1960 Citroen 2CV vs. 2003 Seat Inca Kombi

To start off, 2003 Seat Inca Kombi is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 1,391 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Seat Inca Kombi is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Seat Inca Kombi (59 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1960 Citroen 2CV. (24 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Seat Inca Kombi should accelerate faster than 1960 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Seat Inca Kombi weights approximately 300 kg more than 1960 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1960 Citroen 2CV is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Seat Inca Kombi. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 Citroen 2CV will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Seat Inca Kombi (107 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Citroen 2CV. (50 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2003 Seat Inca Kombi will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Citroen 2CV.

Compare all specifications: