1960 Citroen 2CV vs. 2004 Ford Explorer
To start off, 2004 Ford Explorer is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Explorer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Explorer (239 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 228 more horse power than 1960 Citroen 2CV. (11 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Explorer should accelerate faster than 1960 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Explorer weights approximately 803 kg more than 1960 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Explorer (382 Nm) has 360 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Citroen 2CV. (22 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Explorer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Citroen 2CV.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Citroen 2CV | 2004 Ford Explorer | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | 2CV | Explorer |
Year Released | 1960 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 375 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 11 HP | 239 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 22 Nm | 382 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | 9.4:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 495 kg | 1298 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 19 L | 85 L |