1960 Citroen 2CV vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 2,374 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander (158 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 1960 Citroen 2CV. (11 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1960 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 975 kg more than 1960 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander (220 Nm) has 198 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Citroen 2CV. (22 Nm). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Citroen 2CV.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Citroen 2CV | 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | Citroen | Mitsubishi |
Model | 2CV | Outlander |
Year Released | 1960 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 375 cc | 2374 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 11 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 22 Nm | 220 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 62 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 495 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 19 L | 59 L |