1960 Citroen 2CV vs. 2008 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2008 Toyota Condor is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 2,986 cc, 2008 Toyota Condor is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Condor weights approximately 1217 kg more than 1960 Citroen 2CV.
Because 2008 Toyota Condor is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Citroen 2CV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Condor will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Toyota Condor (192 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Citroen 2CV. (22 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2008 Toyota Condor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Citroen 2CV.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Citroen 2CV | 2008 Toyota Condor | |
Make | Citroen | Toyota |
Model | 2CV | Condor |
Year Released | 1960 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 375 cc | 2986 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 11 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 22 Nm | 192 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 99.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 62 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | 22.2:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 495 kg | 1712 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 5020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 19 L | 70 L |