1960 Citroen 2CV vs. 2012 Holden Calais
To start off, 2012 Holden Calais is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Calais (344 HP) has 320 more horse power than 1960 Citroen 2CV. (24 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 1960 Citroen 2CV.
Because 1960 Citroen 2CV is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden Calais. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 Citroen 2CV will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Calais (530 Nm) has 480 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Citroen 2CV. (50 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Citroen 2CV. 2012 Holden Calais has automatic transmission and 1960 Citroen 2CV has manual transmission. 1960 Citroen 2CV will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Holden Calais will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Citroen 2CV | 2012 Holden Calais | |
| Make | Citroen | Holden |
| Model | 2CV | Calais |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 850 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | V |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 344 HP |
| Torque | 50 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
