1960 DAF 600 vs. 2003 MG TF
To start off, 2003 MG TF is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 DAF 600 would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 MG TF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MG TF (115 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1960 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 MG TF should accelerate faster than 1960 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MG TF weights approximately 470 kg more than 1960 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 MG TF (145 Nm) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 DAF 600. (46 Nm). This means 2003 MG TF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 DAF 600 | 2003 MG TF | |
| Make | DAF | MG |
| Model | 600 | TF |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 590 cc | 1588 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 19 HP | 115 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 46 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 79 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1270 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2380 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 50 L |
