1960 DAF 600 vs. 2003 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2003 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 DAF 600 would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Nissan X-Trail (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 1960 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1960 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 774 kg more than 1960 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Nissan X-Trail (245 Nm) has 199 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 DAF 600. (46 Nm). This means 2003 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 DAF 600 | 2003 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | DAF | Nissan |
| Model | 600 | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 590 cc | 2488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 19 HP | 177 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 46 Nm | 245 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1404 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2660 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 60 L |
