1960 DAF 600 vs. 2005 Pontiac Montana
To start off, 2005 Pontiac Montana is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 DAF 600 would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Pontiac Montana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Pontiac Montana (186 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 1960 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Pontiac Montana should accelerate faster than 1960 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Pontiac Montana weights approximately 1158 kg more than 1960 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Pontiac Montana (278 Nm) has 232 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 DAF 600. (46 Nm). This means 2005 Pontiac Montana will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
1960 DAF 600 | 2005 Pontiac Montana | |
Make | DAF | Pontiac |
Model | 600 | Montana |
Year Released | 1960 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 590 cc | 3491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 19 HP | 186 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 46 Nm | 278 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1788 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 5120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2950 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 95 L |