1960 DAF 600 vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 DAF 600 would be higher. At 2,260 cc, 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (154 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 1960 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1960 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 920 kg more than 1960 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 3 (203 Nm) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 DAF 600. (46 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 DAF 600 | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | DAF | Mazda |
| Model | 600 | 3 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 590 cc | 2260 cc |
| Horse Power | 19 HP | 154 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 46 Nm | 203 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 87.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 94 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1550 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2650 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 55 L |
