1960 DAF 600 vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 DAF 600 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (141 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1960 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1960 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 855 kg more than 1960 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 3 (360 Nm) has 314 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 DAF 600. (46 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 DAF 600 | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | DAF | Mazda |
| Model | 600 | 3 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 590 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 19 HP | 141 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Torque | 46 Nm | 360 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 86 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1485 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2650 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 55 L |
