1960 DAF 600 vs. 2009 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 DAF 600 would be higher. At 3,727 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (268 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 249 more horse power than 1960 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1960 DAF 600.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (269 Nm) has 223 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 DAF 600. (46 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 DAF 600 | 2009 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | DAF | Mazda |
| Model | 600 | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 590 cc | 3727 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 19 HP | 268 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 46 Nm | 269 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2340 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 76 L |
