1960 DAF 600 vs. 2011 Mazda 3
To start off, 2011 Mazda 3 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 DAF 600 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda 3 (148 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 1960 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1960 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mazda 3 weights approximately 670 kg more than 1960 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mazda 3 (183 Nm) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 DAF 600. (46 Nm). This means 2011 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 DAF 600 | 2011 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | DAF | Mazda |
| Model | 600 | 3 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 590 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 19 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 46 Nm | 183 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1300 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1755 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1471 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2639 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 55 L |
