1960 DAF 600 vs. 2012 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2012 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 DAF 600 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 254 more horse power than 1960 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1960 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 1333 kg more than 1960 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm) has 320 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 DAF 600. (46 Nm). This means 2012 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
1960 DAF 600 | 2012 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | DAF | Mazda |
Model | 600 | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 590 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 19 HP | 273 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 46 Nm | 366 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1963 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 5085 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1935 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1727 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2875 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 76 L |