1960 DKW Junior vs. 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 1960 DKW Junior is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 2,779 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk weights approximately 600 kg more than 1960 DKW Junior.
Because 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 DKW Junior, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 DKW Junior | 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
| Make | DKW | Studebaker |
| Model | Junior | Sky Hawk |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 741 cc | 2779 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 1300 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 5150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2180 mm | 2980 mm |
