1960 DKW Junior vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 DKW Junior. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 DKW Junior would be higher. At 2,475 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander (160 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 1960 DKW Junior. (34 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1960 DKW Junior. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 910 kg more than 1960 DKW Junior. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 DKW Junior. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander (220 Nm) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 DKW Junior. (64 Nm). This means 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 DKW Junior.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 DKW Junior | 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
| Make | DKW | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Junior | Outlander |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 741 cc | 2475 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 64 Nm | 220 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 100 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 1610 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2180 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 59 L |
