1960 DKW Junior vs. 2010 Renault Clio
To start off, 2010 Renault Clio is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 DKW Junior. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 DKW Junior would be higher. At 1,149 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Clio (60 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1960 DKW Junior. (34 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1960 DKW Junior.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Renault Clio (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 DKW Junior. (64 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2010 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 DKW Junior.
Compare all specifications:
1960 DKW Junior | 2010 Renault Clio | |
Make | DKW | Renault |
Model | Junior | Clio |
Year Released | 1960 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 741 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 64 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 69 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 76.8 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2180 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 50 L |