1960 DKW Munga vs. 1976 Datsun 260Z
To start off, 1976 Datsun 260Z is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,565 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Datsun 260Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Datsun 260Z (163 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1960 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Datsun 260Z should accelerate faster than 1960 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Datsun 260Z weights approximately 90 kg more than 1960 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Datsun 260Z. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 DKW Munga | 1976 Datsun 260Z | |
| Make | DKW | Datsun |
| Model | Munga | 260Z |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 2565 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 163 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 8.3:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1200 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2581 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 60 L |
