1960 DKW Munga vs. 1976 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1976 Nissan Cedric is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,982 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Nissan Cedric (74 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1960 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 1960 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 246 kg more than 1960 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Nissan Cedric. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 DKW Munga | 1976 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | DKW | Nissan |
| Model | Munga | Cedric |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 1982 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1356 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2700 mm |
