1960 DKW Munga vs. 1999 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1999 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Oldsmobile Cutlass (150 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1960 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 1960 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 290 kg more than 1960 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 DKW Munga | 1999 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | DKW | Oldsmobile |
Model | Munga | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1960 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 3135 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 76 L |