1960 DKW Munga vs. 2000 Volkswagen Caddy
To start off, 2000 Volkswagen Caddy is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,390 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Volkswagen Caddy is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Volkswagen Caddy (59 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1960 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Volkswagen Caddy should accelerate faster than 1960 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 DKW Munga weights approximately 75 kg more than 2000 Volkswagen Caddy.
Because 1960 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Volkswagen Caddy. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 DKW Munga | 2000 Volkswagen Caddy | |
| Make | DKW | Volkswagen |
| Model | Munga | Caddy |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 1390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4700 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1035 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4240 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1850 mm |
