1960 DKW Munga vs. 2002 Spyker C8
To start off, 2002 Spyker C8 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 DKW Munga would be higher. At 4,172 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Spyker C8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Spyker C8 weights approximately 40 kg more than 1960 DKW Munga.
Because 1960 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Spyker C8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 DKW Munga | 2002 Spyker C8 | |
Make | DKW | Spyker |
Model | Munga | C8 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 4172 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1090 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 100 L |