1960 DKW Munga vs. 2002 Volkswagen W12
To start off, 2002 Volkswagen W12 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 DKW Munga would be higher. At 5,982 cc (12 cylinders), 2002 Volkswagen W12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volkswagen W12 (600 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 557 more horse power than 1960 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volkswagen W12 should accelerate faster than 1960 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Volkswagen W12 weights approximately 141 kg more than 1960 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Volkswagen W12. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 DKW Munga | 2002 Volkswagen W12 | |
Make | DKW | Volkswagen |
Model | Munga | W12 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 5982 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | W |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 600 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1251 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1110 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 55 L |